For Whom The Bell Tolls :: essays research papers

The Dis partialityment of Hemingway with state of warHemingway uses certain repetitive themes and ideas in his book, For Whom the Bell Tolls, which relate to the grander dogma that he is trying to teach. By using these reoccurring ideas, he is able to make relieve oneself his views on certain issues and make the reader understand his thoughts. The most historied of this reoccurring theme is that of war. Hemingway uses the war concept as paradoxical irony in this book, to tell the reader what the thinks about war. It is even more interesting to line of products that rather than this theme being derived from this war theme, the book is derived from this main theme.Hemingway express the f each(prenominal)acy of war by discussing how there atomic number 18 no significant winners in war, that war is equal. What goes around comes around. That whereas one humans may down a nonher, another man will come to kill the premier man and so on, in a never-ending cycle of stupidity and f utility. The position of this book can be analyzed here the Spanish polished War in the 1920-30 time period is the setting for the book, on the battlefields in the Spanish countryside. The whole fascist/communist aspect is brought up since both(prenominal)(prenominal) sides are against one another. Here again, Hemingway doesnt idealize either side, not referring to their political beliefs but to the fact that each side is very untold the same. Both sides consist of sad, depressed fools who have been shipped off to war, content to zippy in peace and harmony with each other. It is here that Hemingways first satirical punch at war comes in, when he makes it clear that both sides are human, with no clear line separating the saints from the sinners.Another thing that is machine-accessible to the war concept is that both sides are hopelessly disillusioned. A triumph for any army is not truly a victory if it involves the going away of human life, and Hemingway seems to imply this a s he pokes fun at the ongoings of the war. Atrocities are committed by otherwise compassionate, peaceful people since they are compel to do so by their respective sides. The author also satirizes the illusion that people have of war being glorious, heroic, etc., saying that even a victory is a defeat since so many lie dead in an effort to get that victory. He says that war is not all that, that war is in fact legalized murder, that has no place in human life.