Position paper: Should internationalism be embraced? Essay

The bloodline presented talks rough the Canadian g everyplacenments upcoming actions as it deals with the earths scotch affairs. It croupe be inferred that the author feels that economic successfulness is the nearly important fall guy of progress and a good quality of flavor for Canadians, as jobs and economic growth fecal matter lead to long-term prosperity that will benefit every citizen of the country. An example of this envisioned economic prosperity is the Harper governments economic action plan, which seeks to supply much jobs in rove to prolong and strengthen Canadas performance economically. By saying that costs must be reduced or eliminated in world-wide affairs, it discharge be fictive that the author favours nationalism over internationalism.The talkers stance can then be assumed that he or she would most prefer to pee-pee their country get out the most benefits through the improvement of economic budgeting, over being a world citizen who cares more for t he welfare of the world as a whole, and can be inferred that their position obligates unilateralism, wherein a countrys decisions are make by themselves, without international decide. An example of favouring nationalism over internationalism is the new-fangled backing out of Canada from its military get outicipation in Afghanistan, due to its dear(predicate) costs. This example shows the challenge between balancing both nationalism and internationalism, as Canadas purpose of providing military aid to Afghanistan shows that the country seeks to be of service of process during international crises, barely then its withdrawal shows that as much as Canada seeks to aid Afghanistan, it has to prioritize its own welfare first in order to keep freehanded help.The speakers sentiment in the finishing sentence shows exactly that the programs and benefits must be beneficial to Canadians, not in international affairs where they feel that giving our resources nevertheless hinders Canada s cart track to economic prosperity. Some would agree with the source, as Canadas welfare must forever be prioritized over that of international issues, because they feel that providing aid and resources to other countries would only hinder our progress for prosperity. Others, however, feel that while Canadas upbeat as a country is essential, it is also important to come upon representative in international affairs as a means of economicprogress, humanist aid, and having an influence over the decisions that are being made in international affairs. With these in mind, it is best to agree with the perspective that Canada should also take part in international affairs, as it benefits other countries as closely as our own, taking into account that our internationalistic participation can have an influence in preventing conflict around the world, and that economic progress can be achieved through internationalistic participation.Canadas repute as a supporter of humanistic action s has been established through its constant participation of giving aid and resources for those in need. This reputation is evident during the countrys agile involvement in providing help during major natural disasters, such as the earthquake in Japan on 2010, and the Typhoon Hayan that occurred in the Philippines. Due to these humanitarian actions, Canada has donated millions in order to aid countries as they reestablish themselves after these calamities. It can be assumed that these actions would not be supported by the speaker of the source, as it does not directly affect Canadians in an economically demonstrable manner. However, one has to take in mind that these countries that have been hit by unfortunate calamities may have caused major economic needinesses, the destruction of their environment, and the loss of millions of lives.What if Canada were to have got such a calamity? One may present that these countries are economically lower than Canada, allowing us to be able to support and rebuild ourselves. However, one has to take in mind that if we ever experience the destructive losses that these countries have suffered, help would most likely be given by the countries that we have aided during their adversities, as a sign of gratitude for what we have done for people thousands of kilometers away.Another known reputation of Canada is its active participation in peacekeeping operations that ensure to subside a conflict between two parties. This was clearly evident when Canada seeked to call the involvement of military troops during peacekeeping operations, which was implemented through the joined Nations. This change in the ways that peacekeeping operations were done greatly improved the UNs strength in ensuring a successful rapprochement between parties, a critical factor thatwas skimped on during the establishment of the confederacy of Nations. This was put into action during the suez crisis, as both parties were reconciliated successfully. Can adas involvement in military operations and international organizations not only provides military help, but also shapes critical decisions that may affect the rest of the world, such as Canada and other nations such as the United States putting pressure on Russias Vladimir Putin for their disagreement with Putin sending military troops to Crimea. Despite the loser of Canada to drastically affect Putin and Russias decisions, the international pressure that was applied may have been critical in preventing further conflicts from happening. These acts of peacekeeping argue against the sources perspective,Finally, Canadas participation in International Organizations benefit the country in more ways than one, particularly that of economic progress. The countrys participation in the North American Free Trade musical arrangement (NAFTA) seeks to eliminate trade barriers and tariffs, proving that this international participation benefits Canada economically. Adding on to Canadas benefits of participate in international organizations is our participation in the United Nations and humanitarian involvements, that fosters Canadian pride.Some would agree with the source, as Canadas welfare must always be prioritized over that of international issues, because they feel that providing aid and resources to other countries would only hinder our progress for prosperity. Others, however, feel that while Canadas well-being as a country is essential, it is also important to take part in international affairs as a means of economic progress, humanitarian aid, and having an influence over the decisions that are being made in international affairs. With these in mind, it is best to agree with the perspective that Canada should also take part in international affairs, as it benefits other countries as well as our own, taking into account that our internationalistic participation can have an influence in preventing conflict around the world, and that economic progress can be achieve d through internationalistic participation.