Functionalism in Family Essay

It wasnt until I was eight years old that I was finally adopted. My adopted family, who I consider to be my real family, taught me a mess hall. They help shape and mold me into the person that I am today. According to our class textbook, the family, in its more varying forms, is present in all homo cultures (Schaefer, pg. 306). The family is impacted by all triplet sociological theories. In my paper I will treat the impact that all ternary of the theories. Functionalism, Conflict and Interactionism, have on the social institution of family.I gestate that the social institution of family is what makes us who we are. It helps to form our personality and our lives when we bewilder adults. My family taught me how to make moral decisions in my life, how to become an independent individual in society and how to manage a family of my own. I pretty much do not follow one exact system. I agree with umteen of the different aspects of all three theories. The first conjecture I will discuss will be the Functionalist theory. As outlined by William F. Ogburn, the family is meant to perform six paramount functions as follows* ReproductionProtection * Socialization * Regulation of sexual behavior * Affection and familiarity * Provision of Social Status I agree with Ogburn on many of these functions. I think that the family teaches you acquaintance and how to form an affectionate relationship with roughlyone. I too agree tone of the main functions of a family is Reproduction. god says in the Bible that we are to be fruitful. It is our duty to reproduce to make more beings on earth. My family also serves as a security blanket for me.I know when all else fails my family will al manners be there for me and take me back with no questions asked. The functionalist theory affects the views of an individual in a family in many ways. To me it makes them a more stable person, with more traditional views. Functionalism does not leave too much get on for social change wit hin a family. Usually units of a family have a set of tactile sensations that they were brocaded on and consider the norm for them. TO stray from this would be abnormal and not right. Functionalism was a strong belief years ago when things were more traditional. This was just the way of life.This theory to me would be one of the main reasons why many people are against things such as gay marriage, unmarried couples having babies and shacking up and unwed mothers. On the other side of the spectrum we have the Conflict theorists. Conflict theorists view the family not as a indorser to social stability, but as a reflection of the inequality in wealth and power that is tack together within the larger society (Schaefer, pg. 292). Although I do agree with many of the aspects of the Functionalist theory, I agree with some of the points that the Conflict theory makes as well.I know for a fact when I was a child, my chum got away with murder. in that location were things that I couldnt do that my brother could do because he was a boy. I had a friend who parents wouldnt allow her to go anywhere, she had to go to High School down the cylinder block from her home, she couldnt go to the mall until she was 18, and she was forced to go to college near home. Going away to college was a no- no for her as far as her parents were concerned. However, her younger brother went to a High School way across town from their house, he was hanging out at the age of 13, and he went away to college hours from their house.Many families in many cultures tend to be male chauvinistic, and bring out virtually inequality between the sexes. This was the way of life in the United States at a time. The man was the one who went out and worked and brought home the bacon. There were things that a man could do that woman couldnt. The man was the fix provider and the authoritarian. Nowadays, women have just as much say so as men do. I have much power and role in my family. My kids consider me an d their stepdad to be equals. We make decisions and compromises on many things such as the bills, household inevitably and the children.Although there has been great change in this shift of power from man to woman in a family, there are still some situations where things have not change as much. Studies have shown that for all stay-at-home dad there are 38 stay at home moms (Schaefer, pg. 292). The conflict theory affects the views of individuals in a family because the man a sense of power and authority. It makes the women out to be subservient to her save or to man period. It lends to situations such as Domestic Violence. I came across an article by Kathryn Yount and LiLi, it discusses Egyptian womens justification of Domestic Violence. In a study done, 5,450 women in Egypt, they found that one one-half justified wife hitting or beating for some reason (Yount, 2009). It is the conflict theory that leads many women to believe and justify Domestic Violence. There is little change for social change with the conflict theory. As described in our textbook, conflict theorists also view the family as an economic unit that contributes to social wrong (Schaefer, pg. 292). Society view women as subservient and believe their role to be that of a woman in the kitchen cooking, barefoot and pregnant. Last but not least we have the Interactionalist theory.Unlike the conflict and the functional theory, this theory observes the relationship between individuals in the family and how they interact with one another. In a study of both disgraceful and white two=parent households, researchers found that when fathers are more involved with their children (reading to them, helping them with their homework, or narrowing their television viewing), the children have fewer behavior chores, get along better with others and are more amenable (Schaefer, pg. 293) The relationship between family members kitty determine the outcome of ones behavior.This theory provides a lot of knowl edge on fixing problems in a family. My son was acting up in give instruction and I could not figure what his problem was. When my fiancee and I became more involved with him and his work, having join boy Scouts, and talking to him one on one, his behavior changed. I received less and less calls from his teacher about him acting up in school. In family emergences the importance of mattering to a family in adolescence, Gregory Elliott, demonstrated that the lack of mattering in ones family contributes to the degree of connectedness one feels to the social order (Churchill, 2010).Relationships between family members matter a lot. I have a friend who had a horrible relationship with her mother. In turns she had a liberal relationship with her daughter, and her daughter has a bad relationship with her daughter. Tough love was a major problem in their situation. The Interactionist has the greatest affect on family members views. It makes one more open-minded and understanding. It lea ves mess of room for social change within a family. By studying the relationships between family members we will be able to substantiate behaviors and why certain things happen.Society will in turn change their views on family life and accept change and different forms of families. Many people find it strange that it doesnt matter to me that my kids biological farther refuses to pay child support and I still want him to see his kids as much as possible. I came across a study done by Yoshi Sano, Leslie Richards and Anisa Zvonkovis in the Journal of Family Issues. I found that Contrary to some fathers claims that mothers gate keep their rise to power to children, the majority of mothers in the study just wanted increased father involvement.The mothers trust for active father child interaction was not dampened by their frustration at the lack or irregularity of child support payment, which mothers tended to accept given the lack of economic opportunities in rural communities (Sano, Richards, et. al, 2008). I believe that out of all three theories interactionism teaches one the most and has the greatest impact on family. We can learn from our interactions with one another and others as well. Functionalism is different from all three because it just canonically believes that the family has basic functions.It doesnt go on any evidence or studies. The Conflict theory believes that family brings about conflict. Its sole purpose is to cause inequality between the sexes. The social institution of family is affected by all three of the theories. I feel that and truly believe that it would benefit best form the interactionist theory. This can be back up by studies and research. It will help to make society more understanding. References Churchill, C. (2010, February). Family matters the importance to family in adolescence. Choice, 47(6), 1168.